<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For brokers, a fork in the road</title>
	<atom:link href="http://1000wattconsulting.com/blog/2008/05/for-brokers-a-f.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://1000wattconsulting.com/blog/2008/05/for-brokers-a-f.html</link>
	<description>Turn On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:21:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Dollinger</title>
		<link>http://1000wattconsulting.com/blog/2008/05/for-brokers-a-f.html/comment-page-1#comment-2724</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Dollinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.1000wattconsulting.com/2008/05/for-brokers-a-f.html#comment-2724</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Brian,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To me, this poses the question of, &quot;will this tarnish Trulia&#039;s image?&quot;  I clicked through their banner ads a number of times and found:&lt;br /&gt;
1 - Auction Site for Property&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Mortgage Site Offerings&lt;br /&gt;
1 - Selling of home Furnishings&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I always commended Trulia on their differentiation from Realtor.com with their explosive popup banner ads for cut rate agents, etc. but feel that they might be heading in the same direction?  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I mean, first they sell a premier service to certain companies where their listings (Like Realtor.com) will filter to the top of the search results, and now pop up banner ads?  Doesn&#039;t this go against the moral fiber that you guys are so often sharing with us, your readers?  Doesn&#039;t this all boil down to the &quot;Who&#039;s got more money to spend for online lead CAPTURE?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I, as a capitalist, understand the importance of being able to finance the information that you provide...  but as you state in your post, Brian, do your advertising partner compliment your overall brand?  I guess only time will tell, or if we start to see BuyOwner.com and dancing avatar mortgage rate ads popping up on the side of their site.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Matt Dollinger&lt;br /&gt;
@properties&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>To me, this poses the question of, &quot;will this tarnish Trulia&#39;s image?&quot;  I clicked through their banner ads a number of times and found:<br />
1 &#8211; Auction Site for Property<br />
3 &#8211; Mortgage Site Offerings<br />
1 &#8211; Selling of home Furnishings</p>
<p>I always commended Trulia on their differentiation from Realtor.com with their explosive popup banner ads for cut rate agents, etc. but feel that they might be heading in the same direction?  </p>
<p>I mean, first they sell a premier service to certain companies where their listings (Like Realtor.com) will filter to the top of the search results, and now pop up banner ads?  Doesn&#39;t this go against the moral fiber that you guys are so often sharing with us, your readers?  Doesn&#39;t this all boil down to the &quot;Who&#39;s got more money to spend for online lead CAPTURE?&quot;</p>
<p>I, as a capitalist, understand the importance of being able to finance the information that you provide&#8230;  but as you state in your post, Brian, do your advertising partner compliment your overall brand?  I guess only time will tell, or if we start to see BuyOwner.com and dancing avatar mortgage rate ads popping up on the side of their site.</p>
<p>Matt Dollinger<br />
@properties</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galen</title>
		<link>http://1000wattconsulting.com/blog/2008/05/for-brokers-a-f.html/comment-page-1#comment-2723</link>
		<dc:creator>Galen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 12:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.1000wattconsulting.com/2008/05/for-brokers-a-f.html#comment-2723</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Another question: &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Am I creating an iTunes of real estate - a company that will so control consumer attention that my I will be at their mercy?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another question: </p>
<p>Am I creating an iTunes of real estate &#8211; a company that will so control consumer attention that my I will be at their mercy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Svec, Real Living, Inc.</title>
		<link>http://1000wattconsulting.com/blog/2008/05/for-brokers-a-f.html/comment-page-1#comment-2722</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Svec, Real Living, Inc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 06:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.1000wattconsulting.com/2008/05/for-brokers-a-f.html#comment-2722</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Brian-&lt;br /&gt;
Great post.  Many brokers have given (FREE) Trulia and others the 3rd most vaulable content on the web which they&#039;ve effectively used build their sites.  Now they want to charge us to enhance, advertise, etc.  ARGH.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We are truly at a fork in the road and it&#039;d be nice (selfishly speaking) if brokerages went towards the JLS path or affiliated with firms/franchisors who&#039;ve figured it out.  It&#039;d give us as an industry a better hand to play go forward.    &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian-<br />
Great post.  Many brokers have given (FREE) Trulia and others the 3rd most vaulable content on the web which they&#39;ve effectively used build their sites.  Now they want to charge us to enhance, advertise, etc.  ARGH.  </p>
<p>We are truly at a fork in the road and it&#39;d be nice (selfishly speaking) if brokerages went towards the JLS path or affiliated with firms/franchisors who&#39;ve figured it out.  It&#39;d give us as an industry a better hand to play go forward.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Boer</title>
		<link>http://1000wattconsulting.com/blog/2008/05/for-brokers-a-f.html/comment-page-1#comment-2721</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Boer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 20:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.1000wattconsulting.com/2008/05/for-brokers-a-f.html#comment-2721</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Brian, spot on!  The thing is, there really is nothing &quot;right&quot; or &quot;wrong&quot; about either strategy -- it&#039;s all a matter of internal capabilities, size, and what the broker&#039;s culture can handle.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, spot on!  The thing is, there really is nothing &quot;right&quot; or &quot;wrong&quot; about either strategy &#8212; it&#39;s all a matter of internal capabilities, size, and what the broker&#39;s culture can handle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

